Independent on-chain risk analysis
Decision-grade Trust Briefs for counterparties and lenders.
CredScore provides independent, evidence-based wallet risk assessments so teams can decide who to lend to,
partner with, or grant access to. No KYC. No banks. Just observable on-chain behavior.
Wallet Behavior Analysis
Funding sources, counterparties, patterns, and historical activity across major protocols.
Risk Tier Output
Low, Medium, High risk classification with clear rationale and supporting observations.
Written Trust Brief
A concise deliverable you can share internally with scope, evidence, and mitigations.
How it works
Step 1
Submit wallet(s)
Send addresses and the decision context (lend, partner, grant, or access).
Step 2
We analyze behavior
We evaluate patterns, counterparties, and risk signals across observable on-chain data.
Step 3
Receive the brief
Get a written assessment with tier, evidence, and practical mitigations.
Methodology
CredScore evaluates observable on-chain behavior to form independent risk opinions. We do not use private data,
KYC, or off-chain identity signals.
- Wallet funding sources and provenance
- Counterparty exposure and transaction patterns
- Protocol usage, risk concentration, and behavior changes over time
- Indicators associated with known exploits, laundering paths, or coordination risk
- Decision context (lend, partner, grant, access) applied to observed behavior
All assessments are reviewed by a human analyst and delivered as a written Trust Brief with evidence, rationale,
and practical mitigations.
Why CredScore
No KYC or banks
Human-reviewed
Evidence-based
Transparent reasoning
Decision context aware
What a Trust Brief includes
- Decision context summary (lend, partner, grant, access)
- Wallet funding and provenance analysis
- Counterparty and protocol exposure review
- Risk tier classification with written rationale
- Practical mitigation recommendations
Sample analysis
Coming next: a public sample Trust Brief showing the format, evidence types, and recommended mitigations.